The LGPL has less trouble here than the GPL but it is a significant uncertainty particularly in the GPL which is a companion license. CAPTCHAs are a popular online check designed to differentiate between real users from virtual bots. The FAQ for the current version of the GPL is here. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General Public License instead of this License. Is it worth the extra money to get the V3. GNU General Public Licence. – slebetman Sep 7 '15 at 10:20 Version 3 of the GNU General Public License will soon be finished, enabling free software packages to upgrade from GPL version 2. When distributing derived works, the source code of the work must be made available under the same license. V3 vs V2 Accessport? The GNU General Public Licence, or GPL as it's often called, is the most popular free software licence and it's used by many different projects, including the Linux kernel, the GNU tools and literally hundreds of others. I feel like if im going to spend the money I might as well go big and get the V3 since it has a bigger screen and can display the gauges. Im on the fence of going with the V3 accessport or the V2. gpl-3 license-compatibility gpl-2 linux-kernel.
The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. I wanted to get some opinions of guys who use them. GPLV2 and GPLV3 are versions of the GNU Public Licenses (GPL), a well-known license for free software. The GPL licenses (GPLv3, GPLv2, LGPL, Affero GPL) all contain some kind of share-alike license. The challenge in open source licenses comes from projects that mix different types. GNU General Public License v2.0. The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. GPLV2 vs GPLV3. a) GPLv3 contains compatibility regulations that make it easier than before to combine GPL code with code that was published under different licenses (→ What is license compatibility?). The final one though is that the GPL v3 series of licenses have forced compatibility with the AGPL v3, meaning that code can be taken from GPL programs and have the added restrictions of the AGPL added on in such a way that this cannot be contributed back under the same license. 5,798 4 4 gold badges 25 25 silver badges 66 66 bronze badges. The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your program into proprietary programs. Pandya Pandya. The GPL license, whatever the version, is closed sourced and can't be altered. 1,884 11 11 silver badges 23 23 bronze badges. There is also a guide to understanding it and an in depth discussion of the changes from v2 to v3 at http://copyleft.org/guide/. A GPL linking exception modifies the GNU General Public License (GPL) in a way that enables software projects which provide library code to be "linked to" the programs that use them, without applying the full terms of the GPL to the using program.Linking is the technical process of connecting code in a library to the using code, to produce a single executable file. GPLv2 is incompatible with GPLv3 period. The GPL is also liked with the Free Software Foundation (FSF). Further resources on GPLv2 ... By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. If your program is a subroutine library, you may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with the library. GNU GPLv2 The GNU GPL is the most widely used free software license and has a strong copyleft requirement. To resolve some of these issues and also provide better controls over exact rights, the GPL v3 series of licenses were drafted (the LGPL 3 is part of that).

You are however allowed to apply multiple licenses on your work under either license and both GPLv2 and GPLv3 gives you examples for how to do it. The main author of both licenses is Richard Stallman. Zizouz212. reCAPTCHA v2 vs v3 – Difference between reCAPTCHA v2 and v3 Here, in this article, you will get to learn about reCAPTCHAs, how they work, and the difference between reCAPTCHA v2 vs v3. This page contains answers to commonly asked questions about the GNU General Public License (GPL), version 2.
If a developer modifies a program released under the GPL, he is expected to release the modified program under the same license, but if this program runs on a server only, the developer is not really releasing it to the rest of the world. If not, you need to study what the FSF says about GPL v2 and v3 compatibility. First of all, it is important to note that upgrading is a choice. The Free Software Foundation considers the Apache License, Version 2.0 to be a free software license, compatible with version 3 of the GPL.The Software Freedom Law Center provides practical advice for developers about including permissively licensed source. This concerns in particular code under Apache license v. 2.0. If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General Public License instead of this License.